Three Techniques for Reconstruction of Congenital Microtia

Further readings:

1. • Asher E.S.
   • Evans J.H.
   • Wright R.F.
   • et al.
   Fabrication and use of a surgical template for placing implants to retain an auricular prosthesis.
   J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 228-233
   • Google Scholar
2. • Baluch N.
   • Nagata S.
   • Park C.
   • et al.
   Auricular reconstruction for microtia: a review of available methods.
   Plastic Surg. 2014; 22: 39-43
   • Google Scholar
3. • Berghaus A.
   • Toplak F.
   Surgical concepts for reconstruction of the auricle: History and current state of the art.
   Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986; 112: 388-397
   • Google Scholar
4. • Federspil P.A.
   Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses for facial defects.
   GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 8: Doc03
   • Google Scholar
5. • Firmin F.
   • Dusseldorp J.R.
   • Marchac A.
   Auricular Reconstruction.
   Thieme, Germany2016
   • Google Scholar
6. • Giot J.-P.
   • Labbé D.
   • Soubeyrand E.
   • et al.
   Prosthetic Reconstruction of the Auricle: Indications, Techniques, and Results.
   Semin Plastic Surg. 2011; 25: 265-272
   • Google Scholar
7. • Im D.D.
   • Paskhover B.
   • Staffenberg D.A.
   • et al.
   Current management of microtia: a national survey.
   Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013; 37: 402-408
   • Google Scholar
8. • Johns A.L.
   • Lucash R.E.
   • Im D.D.
   • et al.
   Pre and post-operative psychological functioning in younger and older children with microtia.
   J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015; 68: 492-497
   • Google Scholar
9. • Karayazgan B.
   • Gunay Y.
   • Atay A.
   • et al.
   Facial Defects Restored With Extraoral Implant-Supported Prostheses.
   J Craniofac Surg. 2007; 18: 1086-1090
   • Google Scholar
10. • Lewin S.
    Complications after Total porous implant ear reconstruction and their management.
    Facial Plast Surg. 2015; 31: 617-625
    • Google Scholar
11. • Park C.
    • Lew D.-H.
    • Yoo W.-M.
    An analysis of 123 temporoparietal fascial flaps: anatomic and clinical considerations in total auricular reconstruction.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 1295-1306
    • Google Scholar
12. • Rahne T.
    • Svensson S.
    • Lagerkvist H.
    • et al.
    Assessment of temporal bone thickness for implantation of a new active bone-conduction transducer.
    Otol Neurotol. 2021; 42: 278-284
    • Google Scholar
13. • Reinisch J.
    • Tahiri Y.
    Polyethylene ear reconstruction: a state-of-the-art surgical journey.
    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141: 461-470
    • Google Scholar
14. • Reinisch J.F.
    • Lewin S.
    Ear reconstruction using a porous polyethylene framework and temporoparietal fascia flap.
    Facial Plast Surg. 2009; 25: 181-189
    • Google Scholar
15. • Romo T.
    • Reitzen S.D.
    Aesthetic microtia reconstruction with Medpor.
    Facial Plast Surg. 2008; 24: 120-128
    • Google Scholar
16. • Steffen A.
    • Klaiber S.
    • Katzbach R.
    • et al.
    The psychosocial consequences of reconstruction of severe ear defects or third-degree microtia with rib cartilage.
    Aesth Surg J. 2008; 28: 404
    • Google Scholar
17. • Stephan S.
    • Reinisch J.
    Auricular reconstruction using porous polyethylene implant technique.
    Facial Plast Surg Clin. 2018; 26: 69-85
    • Google Scholar
18. • Subramaniam S.S.
    • Breik O.
    • Cadd B.
    • et al.
    Long-term outcomes of craniofacial implants for the restoration of facial defects.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 47: 773-782
    • Google Scholar
19. • Zhang T.
    • Bulstrode N.
    • Chang K.W.
    • et al.
    International consensus recommendations on microtia, aural atresia and functional ear reconstruction.
    J Int Adv Otol. 2019; 15: 204
    • Google Scholar
20. • Zhao Y.
    • Wang Y.
    • Zhuang H.
    • et al.
    Clinical evaluation of three total ear reconstruction methods.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: 1550-1554
    • Google Scholar