Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 26, ISSUE 2, P153-157, September 2018

Robot-Assisted Glandular Surgery

      The role of robotic technology is expanding in head and neck surgery.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      References

        • Weinstein G.S.
        • O'Malley Jr., B.W.
        • Snyder W.
        • et al.
        Trans-oral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 133: 1220-1226
        • Oliveira C.M.
        • Nguyen H.T.
        • Ferraz A.R.
        • et al.
        Robotic Surgery in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery: A Review.
        Minimally Invasive Surgery. 2012;
        • Yang T.L.
        • Ko J.Y.
        • Lou P.J.
        • et al.
        Gland-preserving robotic surgery for benign submandibular gland tumours: a comparison between robotic and open techniques.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 52: 420-424
        • Muenscher A.
        • Dalchow C.
        • Kutta H.
        • et al.
        The endoscopic approach to the neck: a review of the literature, and overview of the various techniques.
        Surg Endosc. 2011; 25: 1358-1363
        • Marchal F.
        A combined endoscopic and external approach for extraction of large stones with preservation of parotid and submandibular glands.
        Laryngoscope. 2007; 117: 373-377
        • Kim J.K.
        • Shin S.M.
        • Lee H.
        • et al.
        Factors affecting long-term outcome of trans-oral surgery for submandibular stones: a follow-up study of 125 patients.
        Clin Otolaryngol. 2016; 41: 365-370
        • Bhatt N.
        • Perakis H.
        • Brown J.J.
        Trans-oral excision of the submandibular gland.
        Laryngoscope. 2010; 120: S143
        • Kauffman R.M.
        • Netterville J.L.
        • Burkey B.B.
        Trans-oral excision of the submandibular gland: techniques and results of nine cases.
        Laryngoscope. 2009; 119: 502-507
        • Hong K.H.
        • Yang Y.S.
        Surgical results of the intraoral removal of the submandibular gland.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 139: 530-534
        • Terris D.J.
        • Haus B.M.
        • Gourin C.G.
        • et al.
        Endo-robotic resection of the submandibular gland in a cadaver model.
        Head Neck. 2005; 27: 946-951
        • Lee H.S.
        • Park D.Y.
        • Hwang C.S.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of robot-assisted submandibular gland resection via retroauricular approach: preliminary results.
        Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 369-373
        • Kucur C.
        • Durmus K.
        • Gun R.
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of concurrent neck dissection and trans-oral robotic surgery.
        Head Neck. 2016; 38: E519-E523
        • Putz-Anderson V.
        • Bernard B.
        • Burt S.
        Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors.
        Related Musculoskelet. 1997; 97–141 (1-1-7-11. Available at:) (Accessed June 23, 2018)
        • Catanzarite T.
        • Tan-Kim J.
        • Whitcomb E.L.
        • et al.
        Ergonomics in surgery: a review.
        Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018; 24: 1-12
        • Ruitenburg M.M.
        • Frings-Dresen M.H.
        • Sluiter J.K.
        Physical job demands and related health complaints among surgeons.
        Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013; 86: 271-279
        • Park A.
        • Lee G.
        • Seagull F.J.
        • et al.
        Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210: 306-313
        • Kumar S.
        • Narayan Y.
        • Garand D.
        Isometric axial rotation of the human trunk from pre-rotated postures.
        Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002; 87: 7-16
        • Pope M.H.
        • Goh K.L.
        • Magnusson M.L.
        Spine ergonomics.
        Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2002; 4: 49-68
        • Sivak-Callcott J.A.
        • Diaz S.R.
        • Ducatman A.M.
        • et al.
        A survey study of occupational pain and injury in ophthalmic plastic surgeons.
        Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 27: 28-32
        • Lee M.R.
        • Lee G.I.
        Does a robotic surgery approach offer optimal ergonomics to gynecologic surgeons?: a comprehensive ergonomics survey study in gynecologic robotic surgery.
        J Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 28: e70
        • Dalager T.
        • Sogaard K.
        • Bech K.T.
        • et al.
        Musculoskeletal pain among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review.
        Surg Endosc. 2017; 31: 516-526
        • Stylopoulos N.
        • Rattner D.
        Robotics and ergonomics.
        Surg Clin North Am. 2003; 83: 1321-1337
        • Lee J.
        • Kang S.W.
        • Jung J.J.
        • et al.
        Multicenter study of robotic thyroidectomy: short-term postoperative outcomes and surgeon ergonomic considerations.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18: 2538-2547
        • Walvekar R.R.
        • Tyler P.D.
        • Tammareddi N.
        • et al.
        Robotic-assisted trans-oral removal of a submandibular megalith.
        Laryngoscope. 2011; 121: 534-537
        • Razavi C.
        • Pascheles C.
        • Samara G.
        • et al.
        Robot-assisted sialolithotomy with sialendoscopy for the management of large submandibular gland stones.
        Laryngoscope. 2016; 126: 345-351
        • Lee H.S.
        • Kim D.
        • Lee S.Y.
        • et al.
        Robot-assisted versus endoscopic submandibular gland resection via retroauricular approach: a prospective nonrandomized study.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 52: 179-184
        • Ahn D.
        • Sohn J.H.
        • Lee G.J.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of using the retroauricular approach without endoscopic or robotic assistance for excision of benign neck masses.
        Head Neck. 2017; 39: 748-753
        • De Virgilio A.
        • Park Y.M.
        • Kim W.S.
        • et al.
        Robotic sialoadenectomy of the submandibular gland via a modified face-lift approach.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41: 1325-1329
        • Roh J.L.
        Removal of the submandibular gland by a retroauricular approach.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 132: 783-787
        • Prosser J.D.
        • Bush C.M.
        • Solares C.A.
        • et al.
        Trans-oral robotic submandibular gland removal.
        J Robot Surg. 2013; 7: 87-90