Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 22, ISSUE 1, P1-8, March 2014

Evaluation of the Facelift Patient

Published:December 09, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2013.10.002
Evaluation of the Facelift Patient
Previous ArticleContemporary Rhytidectomy
Next ArticleSurgical Anatomy of the Superficial Musculo-Aponeurotic System (SMAS)
      Facelift surgery is unique in many ways and for 100 years has stood the test of time as the most dramatic, effective, predictable, and accepted cosmetic lower facial procedure.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      Further readings

        • Adamson J.C.
        • Horton C.E.
        • Crawford H.H.
        The surgical correction of the “turkey gobbler” deformity.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1964; 34: 598
        • Baker D.
        Rhytidectomy with lateral SMASectomy.
        Facial Plast Surg. 2000; 16: 209-213
        • Baker D.C.
        Complications of cervicofacial rhytidectomy.
        Clin Plast Surg. 1983; 10: 543-562
        • Baker D.C.
        Lateral SMASectomy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 509-513
        • Baker D.C.
        Minimal incision rhytidectomy (short scar facelift) with lateral SMASectomy: evolution and application.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2001; 21: 14-26
        • Baker D.C.
        • Conley J.
        Avoiding facial nerve injuries in rhytidectomy. Anatomical variations and pitfalls.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979; 64: 781-795
        • Baker S.R.
        Triplane rhytidectomy. Combining the best of all worlds.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997; 123: 1167-1172
        • Beckert B.W.
        • Concannon M.J.
        • Henry S.L.
        • et al.
        The effect of herbal medicines on platelet function: an in vivo experiment and review of the literature.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120 ([review]): 2044-2050
        • Connell B.
        Cervical lift: surgical correction of fat contour problems combined with full width platysmal muscle flap.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1978; 1: 355-365
        • Connell B.F.
        Contouring the neck in rhytidectomy by lipectomy and a muscle sling.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978; 61: 376-383
        • Gardetto A.
        • Dabernig J.
        • Rainer C.
        • et al.
        Does a superficial musculoaponeurotic system exist in the face and neck? An anatomical study by the tissue plastination technique.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111 ([discussion: 673–5]): 664-672

      12. Grey’s Anatomy. 20th edition. 1918. Available at: www.bartleby.com. Accessed October 12, 2009.

        • Hamara S.T.
        Composite rhytidectomy.
        Quality Publilshing, St Louis (MO)1993
        • Jost G.
        • Levet Y.
        Parotid fascia and face lifting: a critical evaluation of the SMAS concept.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984; 74: 42-51
        • Mitz V.
        • Peyronie M.
        The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976; 58: 80-88
        • Niamtu J.
        Expanding hematoma in face-lift surgery: literature review, case presentations, and caveats.
        Dermatol Surg. 2005; 31: 1134-1144
        • Ramirez O.M.
        • Pozner J.N.
        Subperiosteal minimially invasive laser endoscopic rhytidectomy. St. Louis: the SMILE facelift.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996; 20: 463-470
        • Rees T.D.
        • Aston S.
        Clinical evaluation of submusculoaponeurotic dissection and fixation in facelift surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977; 60: 851-859
        • Rees T.D.
        • Aston S.J.
        Complications of rhytidectomy.
        Clin Plast Surg. 1978; 5: 109-119
        • Tessier P.
        Subperiosteal facelift.
        Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1989; 34 ([in French]): 193-197
        • Webster R.C.
        • Smith R.C.
        • Papsidero M.J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of SMAS plication with SMAS imbrication in face lifting.
        Laryngoscope. 1982; 92: 901-912

      Article info

      Publication history

      Published online: December 09, 2013

      Footnotes

      The author has nothing to disclose.

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2013.10.002

      Copyright

      © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect

      The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.


      RELX