Review Article| Volume 20, ISSUE 1, P37-52, March 2012

Virtual Technologies in Dentoalveolar Evaluation and Surgery

      This article addresses the use of CT and other imaging modalities in oral and maxillofacial surgery, with an emphasis on dentoalveolar surgery. In the 2005 issue of the Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, Dodson [
      • Dodson T.B.
      Interactive CT software in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
      ] provided an excellent overview on “Interactive CT Software in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.” This article provides an update on the use of CT and presents additional information that reflects further changes and advances that will be of use to the practicing surgeon. We encourage the reader to read the article by Dodson in conjunction with ours.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


        • Dodson T.B.
        Interactive CT software in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 13: 69-81
        • White S.
        • Pharoah M.
        Advanced imaging.
        in: White S. Pharoah M. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 6th edition. Mosby-Year Book Medical Publishers, St Louis (MO)2004: 207
        • Sukovic P.
        Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003; 6: 31-36
        • Bruce R.A.
        • Frederickson G.C.
        • Small G.S.
        Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 101: 240-245
        • Sisk A.L.
        • Hammer W.B.
        • Shelton D.W.
        • et al.
        Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986; 44: 855-859
        • Rood J.P.
        Permanent damage to inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during the removal of impacted mandibular third molars: comparison of two methods of bone removal.
        Br Dent J. 1992; 172: 108-110
        • Rood J.P.
        • Shehab B.A.
        The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990; 28: 20-25
        • Blaeser B.F.
        • August M.A.
        • Donoff R.B.
        • et al.
        Panoramic radiographic risk factors for inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar extraction.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61: 417-421
        • Monaco G.
        • Montevecchi M.
        • Bonetti G.A.
        • et al.
        Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135: 312-318
        • Mahasantipiya P.M.
        • Savage N.W.
        • Monsour P.A.
        • et al.
        Narrowing of the inferior dental canal in relation to the lower third molars.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005; 34: 154-163
        • Koong B.
        • Pharoah M.J.
        • Bulsara M.
        • et al.
        Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibular canal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons.
        Aust Dent J. 2006; 51: 64-68
        • Mah J.
        The cutting edge.
        J Clin Orthod. 2009; 41: 557-561
        • Chenin D.L.
        • Chenin S.T.
        • Choi J.
        The cutting edge.
        J Clin Orthod. 2009; 43: 507-512
        • Kau C.H.
        • Olim S.
        • Nguyen J.T.
        The future of orthodontic diagnostic records.
        Semin Orthod. 2011; 17: 39-45
        • Kau C.H.
        • Littlefield J.
        • Rainy N.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little’s Index.
        Angle Orthod. 2010; 80: 435-439
        • Creed B.
        • Kau C.H.
        • English J.D.
        • et al.
        A Comparison of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models.
        Semin Orthod. 2011; 17: 49-56
        • Valachovic R.W.
        Has CBCT become too much of a good thing? Charting progress.
        American Dental Education Association, Washington, DC2011