Rehabilitation of patients with maxillofacial defects presents a difficult challenge
for the oral and maxillofacial surgeon, the maxillofacial prosthodontist, and the
anaplastologist. To improve the care for patients with maxillofacial defects, it is
important to understand their journey toward rehabilitation from the beginning.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North AmericaAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Mechanical behavior of three maxillofacial prosthetic adhesive systems: a pilot project.J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 943
- Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prosthesis. I. Experimental studies.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969; 3: 81-100
- Intraosseous anchorage of dental prosthesis. II. Review of clinical approaches.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1970; 4: 19-34
- Repair of defects in mandible.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1970; 4: 100-108
- Arsb Goteb Tandlak Sallsk. 1970; 3 ([Swedish]): 9-25
- Tandlakartidningen. 1971; 63 ([Swedish]): 486-497
- Treatment outcome of bone-anchored craniofacial prostheses after tumor surgery.Cancer. 2001; 92: 3045-3050
- Surgical versus prosthetic reconstruction of microtia. The case for prosthetic reconstruction.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64: 1639-2006
- Bone-anchored reconstruction of the irradiated head and neck cancer patient.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993; 108: 334-343
- Craniofacial osseointegration: the Canadian experience.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8: 197-204
- The microflora associated with extraoral endosseous craniofacial implants: a cross-sectional study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 29: 344-350
- Clinical immunological and bacteriological evaluation of adverse reactions to skin-penetrating titanium implants in the head and neck region.Contact Dermatitis. 1992; 27: 1-7
- Selected microbial findings in association with percutaneous titanium implants.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994; 9: 565-570
- Microflora associated with percutaneous craniofacial implants used for retention of facial prostheses: a pilot study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10: 578-582
- A retrospective study of osseointegrated skin-penetrating titanium fixtures used for retaining facial prostheses.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992; 75: 523-528
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
