Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 19, ISSUE 2, P221-232, September 2011

Total Reconstruction of the Temporomandibular Joint with a Stock Prosthesis

  • Eric J. Granquist
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Affiliations
    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, 5th floor White Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Peter D. Quinn
    Affiliations
    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, 5th floor White Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

    Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Suite 5A, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    Search for articles by this author
      Indications for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstruction include bony ankylosis, failed previous alloplastic and autogenous joint replacement, posttraumatic condylar injury, avascular necrosis, posttumor reconstruction, developmental abnormalities, functional deformity, and severe inflammatory conditions that have failed to resolve with conservative treatments. Successful TMJ replacement requires careful preoperative planning, reasonable patient expectations, proper intraoperative technique, regimented postoperative physical therapy, close follow-up, and adequate pain management. Achieving successful TMJ replacement often requires multidisciplinary care from oral and maxillofacial surgeons, pain specialists, internists, physical therapists, and general dentists to optimize patient outcome.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Further Readings

        • Driemel O.
        • Braum S.
        • Muller-Richter U.D.
        • et al.
        Historical development of alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement after 1945 and state of the art.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38: 909-920
        • Fujimura K.
        • Segami N.
        • Kobayashi S.
        Anatomical study of the complications of intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64: 384-389
        • Guarda-Nardini L.
        • Manfredini D.
        • Ferronato G.
        Temporomandibular joint total replacement prosthesis: current knowledge and considerations for the future.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 37: 103-110
        • Quinn P.D.
        Alloplastic reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint.
        Selected Readings Oral Maxillofac Surgery. 1999; 7: 1-20
        • Quinn P.D.
        Autogenous and alloplastic reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint.
        in: Quinn P.D. Color atlas of temporomandibular joint surgery. Mosby, St Louis (MO)1998: 170-212
        • Quinn P.D.
        Lorenz prosthesis.
        Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2000; 12: 93-299
        • Saeed N.R.
        • Hensher R.
        • McLead N.M.
        • et al.
        Reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint autogenous compared with alloplastic.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 40: 296-299
        • Sidebottom A.J.
        Guidelines for the replacement of temporomandibular joints in the United Kingdom.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 46: 146-147
        • Westermark A.
        Total reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint. Up to 8 years follow-up of patients with Biomet total joint prostheses.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39: 951-955